INDONESIA 1957-1958
War and pornography
from the book
Killing Hope
by William Blum
"I think it's time we held Sukarno's feet to the fire,"
said Frank Wisner, the CIA's Deputy Director
of Plans (covert operations), one day in autumn 1956.{1} Wisner
was speaking of the man who
had led Indonesia since its struggle for independence from
the Dutch following the war. A few
months earlier, in May, Sukarno had made an impassioned speech
before the US Congress
asking for more understanding of the problems and needs of
developing nations like his own.{2}
The ensuing American campaign to unseat the flamboyant leader
of the fifth most populous
nation in the world was to run the gamut from large-scale
military maneuvers to seedy sexual
intrigue.
The previous year, Sukarno had organized the Bandung Conference
as an answer to the
Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO), the US-created
political-military alliance of area
states to "contain communism". In the Indonesian
city of Bandung, the doctrine of neutralism had
been proclaimed as the faith of the underdeveloped world.
To the men of the CIA station in
Indonesia the conference was heresy, so much so that their
thoughts turned toward assassination
as a means of sabotaging it.
In 1975, the Senate committee which was investigating the
CIA heard testimony that Agency
officers stationed in an East Asian country had suggested
that an East Asian leader be
assassinated "to disrupt an impending Communist [sic]
Conference in 1955".{3} (In all likelihood,
the leader referred to was either Sukarno or Chou En-lai of
China.) But, said the committee,
cooler heads prevailed at CIA headquarters in Washington and
the suggestion was firmly
rejected.
Nevertheless, a plane carrying eight members of the Chinese
delegation, a Vietnamese, and
two European journalists to the Bandung Conference crashed
under mysterious circumstances.
The Chinese government claimed that it was an act of sabotage
carried out by the US and
Taiwan, a misfired effort to murder Chou En-lai. The chartered
Air India plane had taken off from
Hong Kong on 11 April 1955 and crashed in the South China
Sea. Chou En-lai was scheduled to
be on another chartered Air India flight a day or two later.
The Chinese government, citing what it
said were press reports from the Times of India, stated that
the crash was caused by two time
bombs apparently placed aboard the plane in Hong Kong. A clockwork
mechanism was later
recovered from the wrecked airliner and the Hong Kong police
called it a case of "carefully
planned mass murder". Months later, British police in
Hong Kong announced that they were
seeking a Chinese Nationalist for conspiracy to cause the
crash, but that he had fled to
Taiwan.{4}
In 1967 a curious little book appeared in India, entitled
I Was a CIA Agent in India, by John
Discoe Smith, an American. Published by the Communist Party
of India, it was based on articles
written by Smith for Literaturnaya Gazeta in Moscow after
he had defected to the Soviet Union
around 1960. Smith, born in Quincy, Mass. in 1926, wrote that
he had been a communications
technician and code clerk at the US Embassy in New Delhi in
1955, performing tasks for the CIA
as well. One of these tasks was to deliver a package to a
Chinese Nationalist which Smith later
learned, he claimed, contained the two time bombs used to
blow up the Air India plane. The
veracity of Smith's account cannot be determined, although
his employment at the US Embassy in
New Delhi from 1954 to 1959 is confirmed by the State Department
Biographic Register.{5}
Elsewhere the Senate committee reported that it had "received
some evidence of CIA
involvement in plans to assassinate President Sukarno of Indonesia",
and that the planning had
proceeded to the point of identifying an agent whom it was
believed might be recruited for the
job.{6} (The committee noted that at one time, those at the
CIA who were concerned with possible
assassinations and appropriate methods were known internally
as the "Health Alteration
Committee".)
To add to the concern of American leaders, Sukarno had made
trips to the Soviet Union and
China (though to the White House as well), he had purchased
arms from Eastern European
countries (but only after being turned down by the United
States),{7} he had nationalized many
private holdings of the Dutch, and, perhaps most disturbing
of all, the Indonesian Communist
Party (PKI) had made impressive gains electorally and in union-organizing,
thus earning an
important role in the coalition government.
It was a familiar Third World scenario, and the reaction of
Washington policy-makers was
equally familiar. Once again, they were unable, or unwilling,
to distinguish nationalism from
pro-communism, neutralism from wickedness. By any definition
of the word, Sukarno was no
communist. He was an Indonesian nationalist and a "Sukarnoist"
who had crushed the PKI forces
in 1948 after the independence struggle had been won.{8} He
ran what was largely his own show
by granting concessions to both the PKI and the Army, balancing
one against the other. As to
excluding the PKI, with its more than one million members,
from the government, Sukarno
declared: "I can't and won't ride a three-legged horse."{9}
To the United States, however, Sukarno's balancing act was
too precarious to be left to the
vagaries of the Indonesian political process. It mattered
not to Washington that the Communist
Party was walking the legal, peaceful road, or that there
was no particular "crisis" or "chaos" in
Indonesia, so favored as an excuse for intervention. Intervention
there would be.
It would not be the first. In 1955, during the national election
campaign in Indonesia, the CIA
had given a million dollars to the Masjumi party, a centrist
coalition of Muslim organizations, in a
losing bid to thwart Sukarno's Nationalist Party as well as
the PKI. According to former CIA officer
Joseph Burkholder Smith, the project "provided for complete
write-off of the funds, that is, no
demand for a detailed accounting of how the funds were spent
was required. I could find no clue
as to what the Masjumi did with the million dollars."{10}
In 1957, the CIA decided that the situation called for more
direct action. It was not difficult to
find Indonesian colleagues-in-arms for there already existed
a clique of army officers and others
who, for personal ambitions and because they disliked the
influential position of the PKI, wanted
Sukarno out, or at least out of their particular islands.
(Indonesia is the world's largest
archipelago, consisting of some 3,000 islands.)
The military operation the CIA was opting for was of a scale
that necessitated significant
assistance from the Pentagon, which could be secured for a
political action mission only if
approved by the National Security Council's "Special
Group" (the small group of top NSC officials
who acted in the president's name, to protect him and the
country by evaluating proposed covert
actions and making certain that the CIA did not go off the
deep end; known at other times as the
5412 Committee, the 303 Committee, the 40 Committee, or the
Operations Advisory Group).
The manner in which the Agency went about obtaining this approval
is a textbook example of
how the CIA sometimes determines American foreign policy.
Joseph Burkholder Smith, who was
in charge of the Agency's Indonesian desk in Washington from
mid-1956 to early 1958, has
described the process in his memoirs: Instead of first proposing
the plan to Washington for
approval, where "premature mention ... might get it shot
down" ...
we began to feed the State and Defense departments intelligence
that no one could
deny was a useful contribution to understanding Indonesia.
When they had read
enough alarming reports, we planned to spring the suggestion
we should support the
colonels' plans to reduce Sukarno's power. This was a method
of operation which
became the basis of many of the political action adventures
of the 1960s and 1970s.
In other words, the statement is false that CIA undertook
to intervene in the affairs of
countries like Chile only after being ordered to do so by
... the Special Group. ... In
many instances, we made the action programs up ourselves after
we had collected
enough intelligence to make them appear required by the circumstances.
Our activity
in Indonesia in 1957-1958 was one such instance.{11}
When the Communist Party did well again in local elections
held in July, the CIA viewed it as "a
great help to us in convincing Washington authorities how
serious the Indonesian situation was.
The only person who did not seem terribly alarmed at the PKI
victories was Ambassador Allison.
This was all we needed to convince John Foster Dulles finally
that he had the wrong man in
Indonesia. The wheels began to turn to remove this last stumbling
block in the way of our
operation."{12} John Allison, wrote Smith, was not a
great admirer of the CIA to begin with. And in
early 1958, after less than a year in the post, he was replaced
as ambassador by Howard Jones,
whose selection "pleased" the CIA Indonesia staff.{13}
go to notes
On 30 November 1957, several hand grenades were tossed at
Sukarno as he was leaving a
school. He escaped injury, but 10 people were killed and 48
children injured. The CIA in
Indonesia had no idea who was responsible, but it quickly
put out the story that the PKI was
behind it "at the suggestion of their Soviet contacts
in order to make it appear that Sukarno's
opponents were wild and desperate men". As it turned
out, the culprits were a Muslim group not
associated with the PKI or with the Agency's military plotters.{14}
The issue of Sukarno's supposed hand-in-glove relationship
with Communists was pushed at
every opportunity. The CIA decided to make capital of reports
that a good-looking blonde
stewardess had been aboard Sukarno's aircraft everywhere he
went during his trip in the Soviet
Union and that the same woman had come to Indonesia with Soviet
President Kliment Voroshilov
and had been seen several times in the company of Sukarno.
The idea was that Sukarno's
well-known womanizing had trapped him in the spell of a Soviet
female agent. He had succumbed
to Soviet control, CIA reports implied, as a result of her
influence or blackmail, or both. "
This formed the foundation of our flights of fancy,"
wrote Smith. "We had as a matter of fact,
considerable success with this theme. It appeared in the press
around the world, and when
Round Table, the serious British quarterly of international
affairs, came to analyze the
Indonesian revolt in its March 1958 issue, it listed Sukarno's
being blackmailed by a Soviet
female spy as one of the reasons that caused the uprising."
Seemingly, the success of this operation inspired CIA officers
in Washington to carry the
theme one step further. A substantial effort was made to come
up with a pornographic film or at
least some still photographs that could pass for Sukarno and
his Russian girl friend engaged in
"his favorite activity". When scrutiny of available
porno films (supplied by the Chief of Police of
Los Angeles) failed to turn up a couple who could pass for
Sukarno (dark and bald) and a
beautiful blonde Russian woman, the CIA undertook to produce
its own films, "the very films with
which the Soviets were blackmailing Sukarno". The Agency
developed a full-face mask of the
Indonesian leader which was to be sent to Los Angeles where
the police were to pay some
porno-film actor to wear it during his big scene. This project
resulted in at least some
photographs, although they apparently were never used.{15}
Another outcome of the blackmail effort was a film produced
for the CIA by Robert Maheu,
former FBI agent and intimate of Howard Hughes. Maheu's film
starred an actor who resembled
Sukarno. The ultimate fate of the film, which was entitled
"Happy Days", has not been
reported.{16}
In other parts of the world, at other times, the CIA has done
better in this line of work, having
produced sex films of target subjects caught in flagrante
delicto who had been lured to Agency
safe-houses by female agents.
In 1960, Col. Truman Smith, US Army Ret., writing in Reader's
Digest about the KGB,
declared: "It is difficult for most of us to appreciate
its menace, as its methods are so debased as
to be all but beyond the comprehension of any normal person
with a sense of right and wrong."
One of the KGB methods the good colonel found so debased was
the making of sex films to be
used as blackmail. "People depraved enough to employ
such methods," he wrote, "find nothing
distasteful in more violent methods."{17}
Sex could be used at home as well to further the goals of
American foreign policy. Under the
cover of the US foreign aid program, at that time called the
Economic Cooperation Administration,
Indonesian policemen were trained and then recruited to provide
information on Soviet, Chinese
and PKI activities in their country. Some of the men singled
out as good prospects for this work
were sent to Washington for special training and to be softened
up for recruitment. Like Sukarno,
reportedly, these police officers invariably had an obsessive
desire to sleep with a white woman.
Accordingly, during their stay they were taken to Baltimore's
shabby sex district to indulge
themselves.{18}
The Special Group's approval of the political action mission
was forthcoming in November
1957{19}, and the CIA's paramilitary machine was put into
gear. In this undertaking, as in others,
the Agency enjoyed the advantage of the United States' far-flung
military empire. Headquarters
for the operation were established in neighboring Singapore,
courtesy of the British; training
bases set up in the Philippines; airstrips laid out in various
parts of the Pacific to prepare for
bomber and transport missions; Indonesians, along with Filipinos,
Taiwanese, Americans, and
other "soldiers of fortune" were assembled in Okinawa
and the Philippines along with vast
quantities of arms and equipment.
For this, the CIA's most ambitious military operation to date,
tens of thousands of rebels were
armed, equipped and trained by the US Army. US Navy submarines,
patrolling off the coast of
Sumatra, the main island, put over-the-beach parties ashore
along with supplies and
communications equipment. The US Air Force set up a considerable
Air Transport force which
air-dropped many thousands of weapons deep into Indonesian
territory. And a fleet of 15 B-26
bombers was made available for the conflict after being "sanitized"
to ensure that they were
"non-attributable" and that all airborne equipment
was "deniable".
In the early months of 1958, rebellion began to break out
in one part of the Indonesian island
chain, then another. CIA pilots took to the air to carry out
bombing and strafing missions in
support of the rebels. In Washington, Col. Alex Kawilarung,
the Indonesian military attachÆ, was
persuaded by the Agency to "defect". He soon showed
up in Indonesia to take charge of the rebel
forces. Yet, as the fighting dragged on into spring, the insurgents
proved unable to win decisive
victories or take the offensive, although the CIA bombing
raids were taking their toll. Sukarno
later claimed that on a Sunday morning in April, a plane bombed
a ship in the harbor of the island
of Ambon -- all those aboard losing their lives -- as well
as hitting a church, which demolished the
building and killed everyone inside. He stated that 700 casualties
had resulted from this single
run.
On 15 May, a CIA plane bombed the Ambon marketplace, killing
a large number of civilians on
their way to church on Ascension Thursday. The Indonesian
government had to act to suppress
public demonstrations.
Three days later, during another bombing run over Ambon, a
CIA pilot, Allen Lawrence Pope,
was shot down and captured. Thirty years old, from Perrine,
Florida, Pope had flown 55 night
missions over Communist lines in Korea for the Air Force.
Later he spent two months flying
through Communist flak for the CIA to drop supplies to the
French at Dien Bien Phu. Now his luck
had run out. He was to spend four years as a prisoner in Indonesia
before Sukarno acceded to a
request from Robert Kennedy for his release.
Pope was captured carrying a set of incriminating documents,
including those which
established him as a pilot for the US Air Force and the CIA
airline CAT. Like all men flying
clandestine missions, Pope had gone through an elaborate procedure
before taking off to
"sanitize" him, as well as his aircraft. But he
had apparently smuggled the papers aboard the
plane, for he knew that to be captured as an "anonymous,
stateless civilian" meant having
virtually no legal rights and running the risk of being shot
as a spy in accordance with custom. A
captured US military man, however, becomes a commodity of
value for his captors while he
remains alive.
The lndonesian government derived immediate material concessions
from the United States as
a result of the incident. Whether the Indonesians thereby
agreed to keep silent about Pope is not
known, but on 27 May the pilot and his documents were presented
to the world at a news
conference, thus contradicting several recent statements by
high American officials.{20} Notable
amongst these was President Eisenhower's declaration on 30
April concerning Indonesia: "Our
policy is one of careful neutrality and proper deportment
all the way through so as not to be
taking sides where it is none of our business."{21}
And on 9 May, an editorial in the New York Times had stated:
It is unfortunate that high officials of the Indonesian Government
have given further
circulation to the false report that the United States Government
was sanctioning aid
to Indonesia's rebels. The position of the United States Government
has been made
plain, again and again. Our Secretary of State was emphatic
in his declaration that
this country would not deviate from a correct neutrality ...
the United States is not
ready ... to step in to help overthrow a constituted government.
Those are the hard
facts. Jakarta does not help its case, here, by ignoring them.
With the exposure of Pope and the lack of rebel success in
the field, the CIA decided that the
light was no longer worth the candle, and began to curtail
its support. By the end of June,
Indonesian army troops loyal to Sukarno had effectively crushed
the dissident military revolt.
The Indonesian leader continued his adroit balancing act between
the Communists and the
army until 1965, when the latter, likely with the help of
the CIA, finally overthrew his regime.
NOTES
return to mid-text
1. Joseph Burkholder Smith, Portrait of a Cold Warrior (G.P.
Putnam's Sons, New York, 1976) p.
205.
2. New York Times, 18 May 1956.
3. Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Foreign and Military
Intelligence, Book 4, Final
Report of The Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations
with Respect to Intelligence
Activities (U.S. Senate), April 1976, p. 133.
4. New York Times, 12, 30 April 1955; 3, 4 August 1955; 3
September 1955; 22 November 1967,
p. 23.
5. John Discoe Smith, I Was a CIA Agent in India (India, 1967)
passim; New York Times, 25
October 1967, p. 17; 22 November, p. 23; 5 December, p. 12;
Harry Rositzke, The KGB: The Eyes
of Russia (New York, 1981), p. 164.
6. lnterim Report: Alleged Assassination Plots Involving Foreign
Leaders, The Select Committee
to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence
Activities (U.S. Senate), 20
November 1975, p. 4, note.
7. David Wise and Thomas Ross, The Invisible Government (New
York, 1965, paperback edition)
pp. 149-50.
8. Julie Southwood and Patrick Flanagan, Indonesia: Law, Propaganda
and Terror (London,
1983) pp. 26-7.
9. Wise and Ross, p. 148.
10. J.B. Smith, pp. 210-11.
11. Ibid., pp. 228-9.
12. Ibid., p. 240.
13. Ibid., pp. 229, 246.
14. Ibid., p. 243.
15. Sex-blackmail operations: ibid., pp. 238-40, 248. Smith
errs somewhat in his comment about
Round Table. The article's only (apparent) reference to the
Soviet woman is in the comment on
p. 133: "Other and more scandalous reasons have been
put forward for the President's leaning
towards the Communist Party."
16. New York Times, 26 January 1976.
17. Truman Smith, "The Infamous Record of Soviet Espionage",
Reader's Digest, August 1960.
18. J.B. Smith, pp. 220-1.
19. Referred to in a memorandum from Allen Dulles to the White
House, 7 April 1961; the memo
briefly summarizes the main points of the US intervention:
Declassified Documents Reference
System (Arlington, Va.) released 18 December 1974.
20. The military operation and the Pope affair:
a) Wise and Ross, pp. 145-56.
b) Christopher Robbins, Air America (US, 1979), pp. 88-94.
c) Col. L. Fletcher Prouty, US Air Force, Ret., The Secret
Team: The CIA and its Allies in Control
of the World (New York, 1974) pp. 155, 308, 363-6.
d) New York Times, 23 March 1958, p. 2; 19 April; 28 May,
p. 9.
e) Sukarno, An Autobiography, as told to Cindy Adams (Hong
Kong, 1966) pp. 267-71; first
printed in the US in 1965; although a poor piece of writing,
the book is worth reading for
Sukarno's views on why it is foolish to call him a Communist;
how he, as a Third-Worlder who
didn't toe the line, was repeatedly snubbed and humiliated
by the Eisenhower administration,
apart from the intervention; and how American sex magazines
contrived to make him look
ridiculous.
f) J. B. Smith, pp. 246-7. There appears to be some confusion
about the bombing of the church.
Smith states that it was Pope who did it on 18 May before
being shot down. Either he or other
chroniclers have mixed up the events of April and May.
21. Wise and Ross, p. 145.
This is a chapter from Killing Hope: US Military and CIA Interventions
Since World War II by
William Blum
Killing
Hope