What the EU constitution says
A constitution for the European
Union was agreed in Brussels on 18 June, 2004.
The constitution brings together for
the first time the many treaties and agreements on which the EU
is based. It defines the powers of the EU, stating where it can
and act and where the member states retain their right of veto.
It also defines the role of the EU institutions.
Click on the headings below to find out
the constitution says, and what it means:
What the constitution says:
The Union is said to be subsidiary to
member states and can act only in those areas where "the
objectives of the intended action cannot be sufficiently achieved
by the member states but can rather... be better achieved at Union
level." The principle is established that the Union derives
its powers from the member states.
What it means:
The idea is to stop the Union from encroaching
on the rights of member states other than in areas where the members
have given them away. Critics say that the EU can act in so many
areas that this clause does not mean much but supporters say it
will act as a brake and is an important constitutional principle.
What the constitution says:
The EU already has rights to legislate
over external trade and customs policy, the internal market, the
monetary policy of countries in the eurozone, agriculture and
fisheries and many areas of domestic law including the environment
and health and safety at work.
The constitution will extend its rights
into some new areas, perhaps most importantly into justice policy,
especially asylum and immigration. It does away with the old structure
of pillars under which some policies came under the EU and some
under "inter-governmental" arrangements.
What it means:
It means a greater role for the EU in
more aspects of life. In some areas, the EU will have exclusive
competence, in others a shared competence and in yet more, only
supporting role.
What the constitution says:
The principle of voting by qualified majority
will be generally applied. It is felt that otherwise getting the
agreement of all 25 members would be a recipe for inaction. There
will however be a veto for members in foreign policy, defence
and taxation. And there is to be what's called an "emergency
brake" in which a country outvoted on an issue can take its
case to the European Council, though it can still be outvoted
there. The European Parliament will have an equal say on decisions
requiring majority voting.
What the constitution says:
"A qualified majority shall be defined
as at least 55% of the members of the Council, comprising at least
15 of them and representing Member States comprising at least
65% of the population of the Union."
What it means:
This system replaces the old one under
which countries got specific numbers of votes. There were objections
that Spain and Poland had too many votes and this methods is felt
to represent a fairer balance between large and small countries.
The new one will still lead to complicated permutations of voting
but the final results of the "double majority" should
command more general respect.
An amendment does away with a proposed
procedure under which the European Council could have changed
an area of policy to QMV. Now such a proposal will have to go
before national parliaments and if one objects the measure fails.
What the constitution says:
The European Council, that is the heads
of state or government of the member states, "shall elect
its President, by qualified majority, for a term of two and a
half years, renewable once." The candidate will then have
to be approved by the European Parliament. The President will
"chair (the Council) and drive its work forward and ensure,
at his level, the external representation of the Union."
What it means:
This is a new post. At the moment, the
Council presidency rotates through the member states every six
months, so continuity is lost. The new President will therefore
be a permanent figure with much greater influence and symbolism.
But since he or she will be subject to the Council, the powers
of the post are limited.
What the constitution says:
"The European Council, deciding by
qualified majority, with the agreement of the president of the
Commission, shall appoint the Union Minister of Foreign Affairs...
[who] shall conduct the Union's common foreign and security policy."
What it means:
It sounds grand, but the minister will
only be able to speak on the EU's behalf when there is an agreed
or common policy, for example over the Middle East roadmap which
members have accepted. The post will combine the present roles
of the external affairs member of the Commission with the High
Representative on foreign policy so it will be more prominent,
especially in negotiating trade and aid agreements. The EU is
also to set up its diplomatic service which will strengthen the
Minister's hand.
What the constitution says:
"The Union shall have competence
to define and implement a common foreign and security policy,
including the progressive framing of a common defence policy."
What it means:
It does not mean that a common foreign
or defence policy will be imposed on member states. Each one will
retain a right of veto and can go its own way. There is nothing
that could stop divisions over Iraq for example. The aim however
is to agree on as much as possible. Defence is even more sensitive
and has been ring-fenced by references to the primacy of Nato
for relevant members.
What it says:
The Commission, the body which proposes
and executes EU laws, "will consist of one national from
each Member State" for its first term of five years starting
in November 2004. After that it will be slimmed down to "a
number of members... corresponding to two thirds of the number
of Member States, unless the European Council, acting unanimously,
decides to alter this figure."
What it means:
As a transitional measure to reduce the
fears of small states that they will be ignored, each member state
will have a Commissioner (only one each) from November. The idea
after five years is to slim down the Commission from 25 to 18
(or one or two more if there are more member states by then).
It is felt that the current Commission is too big with not enough
jobs to go round.
What the constitution says:
The European Parliament is to have powers
of "co-decision" with the Council of Ministers for those
policies requiring a decision by qualified majority.
What it means:
The European Parliament has over the years
acquired real power and the constitution confirms this. If the
parliament does not agree to a piece of relevant legislation,
it will not pass. This idea is to strengthen democracy because
the parliament is the only EU institution in which voters have
a direct say.
What the constitution says:
It sets out "rights, freedoms and
principles." These include a whole list from the right to
life and the right to liberty down to the right to strike.
What it means:
The Charter is wide-ranging but has to
be tested in the courts before its exact status is established.
The British government says that rules for interpreting the Charter
mean, for example, that national laws on industrial relations
will not be affected.
What the constitution says:
The EU will for the first time have a
"legal personality" and its laws will trump those of
national parliaments: "The Constitution and law adopted by
the Union institutions in exercising competence conferred upon
it by the Constitution shall have primacy over the law of the
member states."
What it means:
This really just confirms the status
quo, which is that if the EU is allowed to legislate in an area
of policy, its law will overtake any national laws. Equally in
areas where it does not legislate, national law prevails.
By having a "legal personality",
the EU will be able, as an organisation, to enter into international
agreements. The old European Community had this right but the
EU as a whole did not so its status in world diplomacy increases.
What the constitution says:
A new procedure describes how a member
would leave the EU: " A member state which decides to withdraw
shall notify the Council of its intention... The Union shall negotiate
and conclude an agreement with that state, setting out the arrangements
for its withdrawal."
What it means:
It was always the case that a member
state could leave by simply repealing its own legislation. Now
there is a formal procedure designed to show that the EU is a
voluntary association. However a departing member would have to
agree terms so there is an implied threat that it would not be
that easy.
This clause is presumably designed never
to be used.
Europe watch
Index of Website
Home
Page