Email 5
From MS
It's people like you who are going to
cause the downfall of the US and of modern society and throw us
back into a second dark ages. Your whinny, lazy, liberal crap
is the biggest problem with America and i can hardly read your
stuff without the desire to vommit.
___
Steve's reply
It's clear that it would not be possible
for me to have a reasoned conversation with you.
When I reached the point when I was finally
fed-up with mainstream TV news broadcasts, talkshows and pundits,
I stopped watching them. So, for the sake of both of us, don't
visit my website. Your stomach will appreciate it.
*
MS replies
I will do that, but let me pass along
just a little bit of info from my perspective. The human race
since the beginning of civilization has waged war on itself and
at its core it is a violent species. There has always been and
will always be a dominant "empire" who controls the
world and if the US would change its posture to one of peace and
non-interference and stop spending billions and trillions of dollars
on the military and its weapons some other country would fill
the void and we would once again be relegated to a second or third
class state. Much of the world does not like the US or its policies,
but it is from a position of jealousy. If we were not a superpower
no one would care about us. One day the US will fall from its
status, as all great empires eventually do, and people like you
will only hasten that event.
I am sad to make those statements because
I hate violence and death, but in nature you are either a predator
or prey and right now the US is the predator.
However, when that changes many of the
people who complained about our military posture and strength
will realize how important it was. Especially when they and their
children are starving for food, living in the streets, and dying
because they can't get medical help.
One last thing, the militarization of
space is not something to prevent, but something that occurred
over 40 years ago when the USSR launched sputnik. Space was NEVER
reserved for peaceful purposes, except on a meaningless peace
of UN paper, and the US is far behind much of the world in space
weapons. Russia has had an operational ASAT program for 20 years
and China and Russia are actively pursuing ASAT technology while
we in the US "debate" the topic. If the US would sit
back and abstain from this area, as it has for much of the past
40 years we will one day be attacked in space and have no way
to defend ourselves. Arms Control for the most part Does NOT WORK
as has been proven by the Chem/Bio arms contorl attemps and the
fact that many countries have active programs in these areas and
even the countries who signed the pact are still doing R&D
in the area. Arms Control is a great idea that doesn't work very
well.
As an American I respect your right to
express your views, however i fear people like you and their naive
view of the world as a place where peaceful coexistance can exist.
It never has and unfortunately never will.
___
Steve's reply
A reasoned conversation at last.
I agree that the history of the world
is one of hate, cruelty, violence, and war. I agree that the United
States has competitors, and needs to stay strong, in order to
defend itself and its way of life from other 'states' that want
to replace us at the top.
Throughout history, people with power
and wealth, who have often gotten them by foul means, have been
interested not in making a just world, but in accruing still more
power and wealth. That has not changed today.
But, there is also a long history of people
doing incredibly courageous things, risking their livelihoods
and their lives, to make this world a better place. All of the
good (non-technical, non-scientific) things that we have, were
achieved by leaders among the common people who did uncommon things
- building movements, starting organizations, standing up for
others, some they knew and many they did not. The fact that the
"good" people have not succeeded in making this a good
world is not their fault. It does not mean that a better world
is not possible, or that the possibility of one must be dismissed
as naive and foolish.
We thinking human beings have choices:
1) we can emulate the greedy and the powerful, the megalomaniacs
and the kleptomaniacs; 2) we can be naive and foolish and think
love will resolve the world's problems; or 3) we can also look
around, see the world as it is, choose a side, and work to make
this globe a fairer, more just place for all. We can say 'no'
to the warmongers and the profiteers; we can say 'no' to those
who want to, in the name of 'security', dismiss the Constitution
and Bill of Rights and take away the freedoms and liberties that
others have died for, we can reject cruelty, arrogance, and indifference;
we can stand up and say, "we will stay strong, but without
causing unnecessary suffering to those we do not know, to non-Americans,
to the 'other'.
I have no interest in being under the
thumb of Russia or China or any other state with ambitions to
be the next superpower. But if all we do is stay strong so we
can be as arrogant, selfish, greedy and nasty than the other pretenders
to the throne, then in my opinion it is not worth it.
Whether the United States would be a better
ruler of the world than China or Russia remains to be seen. But,
it is not just the 'ends' that count, the 'means' count as well.
If we mimic the worst in history to achieve our goal of economic
and military world domination (and you had better believe that
is what our government's leaders are going for) the price will
not have been worth it, because we will end up with an Americanized
world that is still cruel, violent and unjust.
Americans cannot forever stay ignorant
of their government's actions in the world. We may not want to
know what our leaders are doing in our name, and we may be willing
to accept our government's lies because they make our lives easier,
but that does not relieve us of the responsibility of Washington's
actions.
American democracy is not something we
are, it something we do. If we sit by silently and allow the our
leaders to make policies which are good for some Americans but
bad for much of the world, we may end up with a society and a
world that few of us would want to live in.
We can show the world that a strong nation
can also be compassionate and just, or we can show the world that
in order to be powerful, a nation must be indifferent and cruel.
It is our choice.
In my opinion, our country will be stronger
in the long run, if those who publically dissent from the mainstream
views are allowed to do so, and are accepted as being equally
good Americans. For their views may ultimately be the ones embraced
by future generations as being the most patriotic all.
***
From I
When all reason seems to have been abandoned,
and all humanity forgotten, when democracy has been made into
a meaningless word, spewed forth by those that destroy freedom,
THANK YOU for reaffirming that there are THINKING people who SEE
and speak the truth. As long as there are people who refuse to
submit to the lies there is hope...THANKS for speaking the truth.
I wish everyone on earth would read your website.
***
From RR
You offer a potentially interesting
website. It could be of value if it presented a balanced perspective.
There exists in the website a bountiful amount of criticism for
the United States which is quite easy to do given all of the involvements
of our great nation. Unfortunately, there are no kudos for the
many great things that our nation and our people have accomplished
(you will probably say that I have been propagandized!).
You do provide a copy of the American
Constitution (without comment!) and a non-working point of access
for our Bill of Rights.
Given the imbalance of the quotes and
materials that you site presents, I must conclude that your goals
are something other than education via factual dissertations.
Your site would be admired by Hermann Goebbels as it follows his
doctrine of a big lie frequently repeated will be believed
If revolution is your goal, then we
will meet at the barricades!
_____
Steve's reply
Thank you for your comments. I never intended
the website to be balanced. The purpose of the site is to provide
a progressive/left perspective, to compensate for the right-wing
perspective, on national and world events, that dominates the
mainstream/corporate media.
I offer criticism of U.S. policymakers
and U.S. government policies, because the corporate press does
not. Instead, they offer ideological puffery masquerading as balanced
news reporting; jingoism and sabre-rattling, instead of critical
thinking and reason.
I have done lots of reading over the years,
and I have had difficulty coming up with many great things the
U.S. has done in the world, other than its fight against Nazi
Germany. As a result, the media continues to fight WW II (Pearl
Harbor, Saving Private Ryan).
Are we a great country because we have
more "smart" bombs? Are we great because we are the
rich in natural resources? Are we great because we control the
economic lives of billions around the world? Or, are we great
because our moral actions provide a shining example to the rest
of the world, of a nation of compassion, peace, and humanity,
as we at the same time preserve our security and offer Americans
a comfortable standard of living.
My goal is not to put people at ease,
nor is it to have people agree with me. My goal is to make people
think. If I do that, then the website is accomplishing something
of value.
You mention Goebbels. He would have been
impressed with the lockstep allegiance of the corporate media
and their army of commentators and pundits as they compete with
each other to see who can parrot the administration's domestic
and foreign policy line the loudest. It is propaganda at its most
thorough - Pravda U.S.A.
I do not intend to meet you "at the
barricades". I have no fight with you; we just disagree.
But, if Americans do not learn about the "dark side"
of U.S. policies pursued in their name, and their devastating
impact on the people of the world, it will be our children and
grandchildren, not us, who will pay the price of our "greatness",
and our arrogance. If we continue to alienate the poor and disenfranchised
of the world, those who come after us will see all the good will
the world felt for America after World War II, continue to deteriorate
into anger and hatred. It is our choice to make, but we need to
be informed, for our children's sake.
I have included in this email a few quotes
you might have missed, and which you might find thought-provoking.
"Why of course the people
don't want war ... But after all it is the leaders of the country
who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to
drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist
dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship ...Voice
or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of
the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them
they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of
patriotism and exposing the country to danger."
Hermann Goering, Nazi leader, at the Nuremberg Trials after World
War II
***
"You don't need a totalitarian
dictatorship like Hitler's to get by with murder ... you can do
it in a democracy as long as the Congress and the people Congress
is supposed to represent don't give a damn?
William Shirer, author, 1973
***
"Get on with the business
of killing our enemies as quickly as we can, and as ruthlessly
as we must.... We cannot allow the Taliban safe refuge among the
civilian population. We must destroy them, wherever they hide.
This will surely increase the terrible danger facing noncombatants,
a regrettable but necessary fact of war."
Senator John McCain (R-AZ)
***
"Individuals have international
duties which transcend the national obligations of obedience ...
Therefore [individual citizens] have the duty to violate domestic
laws to prevent crimes against peace and humanity from occurring."
Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal,
1950
***
" Fascism should more appropriately
be called Corporatism because it is a merger of State and corporate
power."
Benito Mussolini (1883-1945), Fascist Dictator of Italy
***
"No form of government,
once in power, can be trusted to limit its own ambition, to extend
freedom and to wither away. This means that it is up to the citizenry,
those outside of power, to engage in permanent combat with the
state, short of violent, escalatory revolution, but beyond the
gentility of the ballot-box, to insure justice, freedom and well
being."
Howard Zinn, on the need for dissent and non-violent protest
***
"Our government has kept
us in a perpetual state of fear - kept us in a continuous stampede
of patriotic fervor - with the cry of grave national emergency.
Always there has been some terrible evil at home or some monstrous
foreign power that was going to gobble us up if we did not blindly
rally behind it ..."
US General Douglas MacArthur, 1957
***
" The modern conservative
is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy:
that is the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness."
John Kenneth Galbraith, economist and author
Email page
Home Page