Was the 2004 Election Stolen?
by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
Republicans prevented more than
350,000 voters in Ohio from casting ballots or having their votes
counted -- enough to have put John Kerry in the White House.
http://www.rollingstone.com/,
Spring 2006
Like many Americans, I spent the evening
of the 2004 election watching the returns on television and wondering
how the exit polls, which predicted an overwhelming victory for
John Kerry, had gotten it so wrong. By midnight, the official
tallies showed a decisive lead for George Bush -- and the next
day, lacking enough legal evidence to contest the results, Kerry
conceded. Republicans derided anyone who expressed doubts about
Bush's victory as nut cases in ''tinfoil hats,'' while the national
media, with few exceptions, did little to question the validity
of the election. The Washington Post immediately dismissed allegations
of fraud as ''conspiracy theories,''(1) and The New York Times
declared that ''there is no evidence of vote theft or errors on
a large scale.''(2)
But despite the media blackout, indications
continued to emerge that something deeply troubling had taken
place in 2004. Nearly half of the 6 million American voters living
abroad(3) never received their ballots -- or received them too
late to vote(4) -- after the Pentagon unaccountably shut down
a state-of-the-art Web site used to file overseas registrations.(5)
A consulting firm called Sproul & Associates, which was hired
by the Republican National Committee to register voters in six
battleground states,(6) was discovered shredding Democratic registrations.(7)
In New Mexico, which was decided by 5,988 votes,(8) malfunctioning
machines mysteriously failed to properly register a presidential
vote on more than 20,000 ballots.(9) Nationwide, according to
the federal commission charged with implementing election reforms,
as many as 1 million ballots were spoiled by faulty voting equipment
-- roughly one for every 100 cast.(10)
The reports were especially disturbing
in Ohio, the critical battleground state that clinched Bush's
victory in the electoral college. Officials there purged tens
of thousands of eligible voters from the rolls, neglected to process
registration cards generated by Democratic voter drives, shortchanged
Democratic precincts when they allocated voting machines and illegally
derailed a recount that could have given Kerry the presidency.
A precinct in an evangelical church in Miami County recorded an
impossibly high turnout of ninety-eight percent, while a polling
place in inner-city Cleveland recorded an equally impossible turnout
of only seven percent. In Warren County, GOP election officials
even invented a nonexistent terrorist threat to bar the media
from monitoring the official vote count.(11)
Any election, of course, will have anomalies.
America's voting system is a messy patchwork of polling rules
run mostly by county and city officials. ''We didn't have one
election for president in 2004,'' says Robert Pastor, who directs
the Center for Democracy and Election Management at American University.
''We didn't have fifty elections. We actually had 13,000 elections
run by 13,000 independent, quasi-sovereign counties and municipalities.''
But what is most anomalous about the irregularities
in 2004 was their decidedly partisan bent: Almost without exception
they hurt John Kerry and benefited George Bush. After carefully
examining the evidence, I've become convinced that the president's
party mounted a massive, coordinated campaign to subvert the will
of the people in 2004. Across the country, Republican election
officials and party stalwarts employed a wide range of illegal
and unethical tactics to fix the election. A review of the available
data reveals that in Ohio alone, at least 357,000 voters, the
overwhelming majority of them Democratic, were prevented from
casting ballots or did not have their votes counted in 2004(12)
-- more than enough to shift the results of an election decided
by 118,601 votes.(13) (See Ohio's Missing Votes) In what may be
the single most astounding fact from the election, one in every
four Ohio citizens who registered to vote in 2004 showed up at
the polls only to discover that they were not listed on the rolls,
thanks to GOP efforts to stem the unprecedented flood of Democrats
eager to cast ballots.(14) And that doesn?t even take into account
the troubling evidence of outright fraud, which indicates that
upwards of 80,000 votes for Kerry were counted instead for Bush.
That alone is a swing of more than 160,000 votes -- enough to
have put John Kerry in the White House.(15)
''It was terrible,'' says Sen. Christopher
Dodd, who helped craft reforms in 2002 that were supposed to prevent
such electoral abuses. ''People waiting in line for twelve hours
to cast their ballots, people not being allowed to vote because
they were in the wrong precinct -- it was an outrage. In Ohio,
you had a secretary of state who was determined to guarantee a
Republican outcome. I'm terribly disheartened.''
Indeed, the extent of the GOP's effort
to rig the vote shocked even the most experienced observers of
American elections. ''Ohio was as dirty an election as America
has ever seen,'' Lou Harris, the father of modern political polling,
told me. ''You look at the turnout and votes in individual precincts,
compared to the historic patterns in those counties, and you can
tell where the discrepancies are. They stand out like a sore thumb.''
I. The Exit Polls_The first indication
that something was gravely amiss on November 2nd, 2004, was the
inexplicable discrepancies between exit polls and actual vote
counts. Polls in thirty states weren't just off the mark -- they
deviated to an extent that cannot be accounted for by their margin
of error. In all but four states, the discrepancy favored President
Bush.(16)
Over the past decades, exit polling has
evolved into an exact science. Indeed, among pollsters and statisticians,
such surveys are thought to be the most reliable. Unlike pre-election
polls, in which voters are asked to predict their own behavior
at some point in the future, exit polls ask voters leaving the
voting booth to report an action they just executed. The results
are exquisitely accurate: Exit polls in Germany, for example,
have never missed the mark by more than three-tenths of one percent.(17)
''Exit polls are almost never wrong,'' Dick Morris, a political
consultant who has worked for both Republicans and Democrats,
noted after the 2004 vote. Such surveys are ''so reliable,'' he
added, ''that they are used as guides to the relative honesty
of elections in Third World countries.''(18) In 2003, vote tampering
revealed by exit polling in the Republic of Georgia forced Eduard
Shevardnadze to step down.(19) And in November 2004, exit polling
in the Ukraine -- paid for by the Bush administration -- exposed
election fraud that denied Viktor Yushchenko the presidency.(20)
But that same month, when exit polls revealed
disturbing disparities in the U.S. election, the six media organizations
that had commissioned the survey treated its very existence as
an embarrassment. Instead of treating the discrepancies as a story
meriting investigation, the networks scrubbed the offending results
from their Web sites and substituted them with ''corrected'' numbers
that had been weighted, retroactively, to match the official vote
count. Rather than finding fault with the election results, the
mainstream media preferred to dismiss the polls as flawed.(21)
''The people who ran the exit polling,
and all those of us who were their clients, recognized that it
was deeply flawed,'' says Tom Brokaw, who served as anchor for
NBC News during the 2004 election. ''They were really screwed
up -- the old models just don't work anymore. I would not go on
the air with them again.''
In fact, the exit poll created for the
2004 election was designed to be the most reliable voter survey
in history. The six news organizations -- running the ideological
gamut from CBS to Fox News -- retained Edison Media Research and
Mitofsky International,(22) whose principal, Warren Mitofsky,
pioneered the exit poll for CBS in 1967(23) and is widely credited
with assuring the credibility of Mexico's elections in 1994.(24)
For its nationwide poll, Edison/Mitofsky selected a random subsample
of 12,219 voters(25) -- approximately six times larger than those
normally used in national polls(26) -- driving the margin of error
down to approximately plus or minus one percent.(27)
On the evening of the vote, reporters
at each of the major networks were briefed by pollsters at 7:54
p.m. Kerry, they were informed, had an insurmountable lead and
would win by a rout: at least 309 electoral votes to Bush's 174,
with fifty-five too close to call.(28) In London, Prime Minister
Tony Blair went to bed contemplating his relationship with President-elect
Kerry.(29)
As the last polling stations closed on
the West Coast, exit polls showed Kerry ahead in ten of eleven
battleground states -- including commanding leads in Ohio and
Florida -- and winning by a million and a half votes nationally.
The exit polls even showed Kerry breathing down Bush's neck in
supposed GOP strongholds Virginia and North Carolina.(30) Against
these numbers, the statistical likelihood of Bush winning was
less than one in 450,000.(31) ''Either the exit polls, by and
large, are completely wrong,'' a Fox News analyst declared, ''or
George Bush loses.''(32)
But as the evening progressed, official
tallies began to show implausible disparities -- as much as 9.5
percent -- with the exit polls. In ten of the eleven battleground
states, the tallied margins departed from what the polls had predicted.
In every case, the shift favored Bush. Based on exit polls, CNN
had predicted Kerry defeating Bush in Ohio by a margin of 4.2
percentage points. Instead, election results showed Bush winning
the state by 2.5 percent. Bush also tallied 6.5 percent more than
the polls had predicted in Pennsylvania, and 4.9 percent more
in Florida.(33)
According to Steven F. Freeman, a visiting
scholar at the University of Pennsylvania who specializes in research
methodology, the odds against all three of those shifts occurring
in concert are one in 660,000. ''As much as we can say in sound
science that something is impossible,'' he says, ''it is impossible
that the discrepancies between predicted and actual vote count
in the three critical battleground states of the 2004 election
could have been due to chance or random error.'' (See The Tale
of the Exit Polls)
Puzzled by the discrepancies, Freeman
laboriously examined the raw polling data released by Edison/Mitofsky
in January 2005. ''I'm not even political -- I despise the Democrats,''
he says. ''I'm a survey expert. I got into this because I was
mystified about how the exit polls could have been so wrong.''
In his forthcoming book, Was the 2004 Presidential Election Stolen?
Exit Polls, Election Fraud, and the Official Count, Freeman lays
out a statistical analysis of the polls that is deeply troubling.
In its official postmortem report issued
two months after the election, Edison/Mitofsky was unable to identify
any flaw in its methodology -- so the pollsters, in essence, invented
one for the electorate. According to Mitofsky, Bush partisans
were simply disinclined to talk to exit pollsters on November
2nd(34) -- displaying a heretofore unknown and undocumented aversion
that skewed the polls in Kerry's favor by a margin of 6.5 percent
nationwide.(35)
Industry peers didn't buy it. John Zogby,
one of the nation's leading pollsters, told me that Mitofsky's
''reluctant responder'' hypothesis is ''preposterous.''(36) Even
Mitofsky, in his official report, underscored the hollowness of
his theory: ''It is difficult to pinpoint precisely the reasons
that, in general, Kerry voters were more likely to participate
in the exit polls than Bush voters.''(37)
Now, thanks to careful examination of
Mitofsky's own data by Freeman and a team of eight researchers,
we can say conclusively that the theory is dead wrong. In fact
it was Democrats, not Republicans, who were more disinclined to
answer pollsters' questions on Election Day. In Bush strongholds,
Freeman and the other researchers found that fifty-six percent
of voters completed the exit survey -- compared to only fifty-three
percent in Kerry strongholds.(38) ''The data presented to support
the claim not only fails to substantiate it,'' observes Freeman,
''but actually contradicts it.''
What's more, Freeman found, the greatest
disparities between exit polls and the official vote count came
in Republican strongholds. In precincts where Bush received at
least eighty percent of the vote, the exit polls were off by an
average of ten percent. By contrast, in precincts where Kerry
dominated by eighty percent or more, the exit polls were accurate
to within three tenths of one percent -- a pattern that suggests
Republican election officials stuffed the ballot box in Bush country.(39)
''When you look at the numbers, there
is a tremendous amount of data that supports the supposition of
election fraud,'' concludes Freeman. ''The discrepancies are higher
in battleground states, higher where there were Republican governors,
higher in states with greater proportions of African-American
communities and higher in states where there were the most Election
Day complaints. All these are strong indicators of fraud -- and
yet this supposition has been utterly ignored by the press and,
oddly, by the Democratic Party.''
The evidence is especially strong in Ohio.
In January, a team of mathematicians from the National Election
Data Archive, a nonpartisan watchdog group, compared the state's
exit polls against the certified vote count in each of the forty-nine
precincts polled by Edison/Mitofsky. In twenty-two of those precincts
-- nearly half of those polled -- they discovered results that
differed widely from the official tally. Once again -- against
all odds -- the widespread discrepancies were stacked massively
in Bush's favor: In only two of the suspect twenty-two precincts
did the disparity benefit Kerry. The wildest discrepancy came
from the precinct Mitofsky numbered ''27,'' in order to protect
the anonymity of those surveyed. According to the exit poll, Kerry
should have received sixty-seven percent of the vote in this precinct.
Yet the certified tally gave him only thirty-eight percent. The
statistical odds against such a variance are just shy of one in
3 billion.(40)
Such results, according to the archive,
provide ''virtually irrefutable evidence of vote miscount.'' The
discrepancies, the experts add, ''are consistent with the hypothesis
that Kerry would have won Ohio's electoral votes if Ohio's official
vote counts had accurately reflected voter intent.''(41) According
to Ron Baiman, vice president of the archive and a public policy
analyst at Loyola University in Chicago, ''No rigorous statistical
explanation'' can explain the ''completely nonrandom'' disparities
that almost uniformly benefited Bush. The final results, he adds,
are ''completely consistent with election fraud -- specifically
vote shifting.''
II. The Partisan Official_No state was
more important in the 2004 election than Ohio. The state has been
key to every Republican presidential victory since Abraham Lincoln's,
and both parties overwhelmed the state with television ads, field
organizers and volunteers in an effort to register new voters
and energize old ones. Bush and Kerry traveled to Ohio a total
of forty-nine times during the campaign -- more than to any other
state.(42)
But in the battle for Ohio, Republicans
had a distinct advantage: The man in charge of the counting was
Kenneth Blackwell, the co-chair of President Bush's re-election
committee.(43) As Ohio's secretary of state, Blackwell had broad
powers to interpret and implement state and federal election laws
-- setting standards for everything from the processing of voter
registration to the conduct of official recounts.(44) And as Bush's
re-election chair in Ohio, he had a powerful motivation to rig
the rules for his candidate. Blackwell, in fact, served as the
''principal electoral system adviser'' for Bush during the 2000
recount in Florida,(45) where he witnessed firsthand the success
of his counterpart Katherine Harris, the Florida secretary of
state who co-chaired Bush's campaign there.(46)
Blackwell -- now the Republican candidate
for governor of Ohio(47) -- is well-known in the state as a fierce
partisan eager to rise in the GOP. An outspoken leader of Ohio's
right-wing fundamentalists, he opposes abortion even in cases
of rape(48) and was the chief cheerleader for the anti-gay-marriage
amendment that Republicans employed to spark turnout in rural
counties(49). He has openly denounced Kerry as ''an unapologetic
liberal Democrat,''(50) and during the 2004 election he used his
official powers to disenfranchise hundreds of thousands of Ohio
citizens in Democratic strongholds. In a ruling issued two weeks
before the election, a federal judge rebuked Blackwell for seeking
to ''accomplish the same result in Ohio in 2004 that occurred
in Florida in 2000.''(51)
''The secretary of state is supposed to
administer elections -- not throw them,'' says Rep. Dennis Kucinich,
a Democrat from Cleveland who has dealt with Blackwell for years.
''The election in Ohio in 2004 stands out as an example of how,
under color of law, a state election official can frustrate the
exercise of the right to vote.''
The most extensive investigation of what
happened in Ohio was conducted by Rep. John Conyers, the ranking
Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee.(52) Frustrated by his
party's failure to follow up on the widespread evidence of voter
intimidation and fraud, Conyers and the committee's minority staff
held public hearings in Ohio, where they looked into more than
50,000 complaints from voters.(53) In January 2005, Conyers issued
a detailed report that outlined ''massive and unprecedented voter
irregularities and anomalies in Ohio.'' The problems, the report
concludes, were ''caused by intentional misconduct and illegal
behavior, much of it involving Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell.''(54)
''Blackwell made Katherine Harris look
like a cupcake,'' Conyers told me. ''He saw his role as limiting
the participation of Democratic voters. We had hearings in Columbus
for two days. We could have stayed two weeks, the level of fury
was so high. Thousands of people wanted to testify. Nothing like
this had ever happened to them before.''
When ROLLING STONE confronted Blackwell
about his overtly partisan attempts to subvert the election, he
dismissed any such claim as ''silly on its face.'' Ohio, he insisted
in a telephone interview, set a ''gold standard'' for electoral
fairness. In fact, his campaign to subvert the will of the voters
had begun long before Election Day. Instead of welcoming the avalanche
of citizen involvement sparked by the campaign, Blackwell permitted
election officials in Cleveland, Cincinnati and Toledo to conduct
a massive purge of their voter rolls, summarily expunging the
names of more than 300,000 voters who had failed to cast ballots
in the previous two national elections.(55) In Cleveland, which
went five-to-one for Kerry, nearly one in four voters were wiped
from the rolls between 2000 and 2004.(56)
There were legitimate reasons to clean
up voting lists: Many of the names undoubtedly belonged to people
who had moved or died. But thousands more were duly registered
voters who were deprived of their constitutional right to vote
-- often without any notification -- simply because they had decided
not to go to the polls in prior elections.(57) In Cleveland's
precinct 6C, where more than half the voters on the rolls were
deleted,(58) turnout was only 7.1 percent(59) -- the lowest in
the state.
According to the Conyers report, improper
purging ''likely disenfranchised tens of thousands of voters statewide.''(60)
If only one in ten of the 300,000 purged voters showed up on Election
Day -- a conservative estimate, according to election scholars
-- that is 30,000 citizens who were unfairly denied the opportunity
to cast ballots.
III. The Strike Force_In the months leading
up to the election, Ohio was in the midst of the biggest registration
drive in its history. Tens of thousands of volunteers and paid
political operatives from both parties canvassed the state, racing
to register new voters in advance of the October 4th deadline.
To those on the ground, it was clear that Democrats were outpacing
their Republican counterparts: A New York Times analysis before
the election found that new registrations in traditional Democratic
strongholds were up 250 percent, compared to only twenty-five
percent in Republican-leaning counties.(61) ''The Democrats have
been beating the pants off us in the air and on the ground,''
a GOP county official in Columbus confessed to The Washington
Times.(62)
To stem the tide of new registrations,
the Republican National Committee and the Ohio Republican Party
attempted to knock tens of thousands of predominantly minority
and urban voters off the rolls through illegal mailings known
in electioneering jargon as ''caging.'' During the Eighties, after
the GOP used such mailings to disenfranchise nearly 76,000 black
voters in New Jersey and Louisiana, it was forced to sign two
separate court orders agreeing to abstain from caging.(63) But
during the summer of 2004, the GOP targeted minority voters in
Ohio by zip code, sending registered letters to more than 200,000
newly registered voters(64) in sixty-five counties.(65) On October
22nd, a mere eleven days before the election, Ohio Republican
Party Chairman Bob Bennett -- who also chairs the board of elections
in Cuyahoga County -- sought to invalidate the registrations of
35,427 voters who had refused to sign for the letters or whose
mail came back as undeliverable.(66) Almost half of the challenged
voters were from Democratic strongholds in and around Cleveland.(67)
There were plenty of valid reasons that
voters had failed to respond to the mailings: The list included
people who couldn't sign for the letters because they were serving
in the U.S. military, college students whose school and home addresses
differed,(68) and more than 1,000 homeless people who had no permanent
mailing address.(69) But the undeliverable mail, Bennett claimed,
proved the new registrations were fraudulent.
By law, each voter was supposed to receive
a hearing before being stricken from the rolls.(70) Instead, in
the week before the election, kangaroo courts were rapidly set
up across the state at Blackwell's direction that would inevitably
disenfranchise thousands of voters at a time(71) -- a process
that one Democratic election official in Toledo likened to an
''inquisition.''(72) Not that anyone was given a chance to actually
show up and defend their right to vote: Notices to challenged
voters were not only sent out impossibly late in the process,
they were mailed to the very addresses that the Republicans contended
were faulty.(73) Adding to the atmosphere of intimidation, sheriff's
detectives in Sandusky County were dispatched to the homes of
challenged voters to investigate the GOP's claims of fraud.(74)
''I'm afraid this is going to scare these
people half to death, and they are never going to show up on Election
Day,'' Barb Tuckerman, director of the Sandusky Board of Elections,
told local reporters. ''Many of them are young people who have
registered for the first time. I've called some of these people,
and they are perfectly legitimate.''(75)
On October 27th, ruling that the effort
likely violated both the ''constitutional right to due process
and constitutional right to vote,'' U.S. District Judge Susan
Dlott put a halt to the GOP challenge(76) -- but not before tens
of thousands of new voters received notices claiming they were
improperly registered. Some election officials in the state illegally
ignored Dlott's ruling, stripping hundreds of voters from the
rolls.(77) In Columbus and elsewhere, challenged registrants were
never notified that the court had cleared them to vote.
On October 29th, a federal judge found
that the Republican Party had violated the court orders from the
Eighties that barred it from caging. ''The return of mail does
not implicate fraud,'' the court affirmed,(78) and the disenfranchisement
effort illegally targeted ''precincts where minority voters predominate,
interfering with and discouraging voters from voting in those
districts.''(79) Nor were such caging efforts limited to Ohio:
The GOP also targeted hundreds of thousands of urban voters in
the battleground states of Florida,(80) Pennsylvania(81) and Wisconsin.(82)
Republicans in Ohio also worked to deny
the vote to citizens who had served jail time for felonies. Although
rehabilitated prisoners are entitled to vote in Ohio, election
officials in Cincinnati demanded that former convicts get a judge
to sign off before they could register to vote.(83) In case they
didn't get the message, Republican operatives turned to intimidation.
According to the Conyers report, a team of twenty-five GOP volunteers
calling themselves the Mighty Texas Strike Force holed up at the
Holiday Inn in Columbus a day before the election, around the
corner from the headquarters of the Ohio Republican Party -- which
paid for their hotel rooms. The men were overheard by a hotel
worker ''using pay phones to make intimidating calls to likely
voters'' and threatening former convicts with jail time if they
tried to cast ballots.(84)
This was no freelance operation. The Strike
Force -- an offshoot of the Republican National Committee(85)
-- was part of a team of more than 1,500 volunteers from Texas
who were deployed to battleground states, usually in teams of
ten. Their leader was Pat Oxford, (86) a Houston lawyer who managed
Bush's legal defense team in 2000 in Florida,(87) where he warmly
praised the efforts of a mob that stormed the Miami-Dade County
election offices and halted the recount. It was later revealed
that those involved in the ''Brooks Brothers Riot'' were not angry
Floridians but paid GOP staffers, many of them flown in from out
of state.(88) Photos of the protest show that one of the ''rioters''
was Joel Kaplan, who has just taken the place of Karl Rove at
the White House, where he now directs the president's policy operations.(89)
IV. Barriers to Registration_To further
monkey-wrench the process he was bound by law to safeguard, Blackwell
cited an arcane elections regulation to make it harder to register
new voters. In a now-infamous decree, Blackwell announced on September
7th -- less than a month before the filing deadline -- that election
officials would process registration forms only if they were printed
on eighty-pound unwaxed white paper stock, similar to a typical
postcard. Justifying his decision to ROLLING STONE, Blackwell
portrayed it as an attempt to protect voters: ''The postal service
had recommended to us that we establish a heavy enough paper-weight
standard that we not disenfranchise voters by having their registration
form damaged by postal equipment.'' Yet Blackwell's order also
applied to registrations delivered in person to election offices.
He further specified that any valid registration cards printed
on lesser paper stock that miraculously survived the shredding
gauntlet at the post office were not to be processed; instead,
they were to be treated as applications for a registration form,
requiring election boards to send out a brand-new card.(90)
Blackwell's directive clearly violated
the Voting Rights Act, which stipulates that no one may be denied
the right to vote because of a registration error that ''is not
material in determining whether such individual is qualified under
state law to vote.''(91) The decision immediately threw registration
efforts into chaos. Local newspapers that had printed registration
forms in their pages saw their efforts invalidated.(92) Delaware
County posted a notice online saying it could no longer accept
its own registration forms.(93) Even Blackwell couldn't follow
the protocol: The Columbus Dispatch reported that his own staff
distributed registration forms on lighter-weight paper that was
illegal under his rule. Under the threat of court action, Blackwell
ultimately revoked his order on September 28th -- six days before
the registration deadline.(94)
But by then, the damage was done. Election
boards across the state, already understaffed and backlogged with
registration forms, were unable to process them all in time. According
to a statistical analysis conducted in May by the nonpartisan
Greater Cleveland Voter Coalition, 16,000 voters in and around
the city were disenfranchised because of data-entry errors by
election officials,(95) and another 15,000 lost the right to vote
due to largely inconsequential omissions on their registration
cards.(96) Statewide, the study concludes, a total of 72,000 voters
were disenfranchised through avoidable registration errors --
one percent of all voters in an election decided by barely two
percent.(97)
Despite the widespread problems, Blackwell
authorized only one investigation of registration errors after
the election -- in Toledo -- but the report by his own inspectors
offers a disturbing snapshot of the malfeasance and incompetence
that plagued the entire state.(98) The top elections official
in Toledo was a partisan in the Blackwell mold: Bernadette Noe,
who chaired both the county board of elections and the county
Republican Party.(99) The GOP post was previously held by her
husband, Tom Noe,(100) who currently faces felony charges for
embezzling state funds and illegally laundering $45,400 of his
own money through intermediaries to the Bush campaign.(101)
State inspectors who investigated the
elections operation in Toledo discovered ''areas of grave concern.''(102)
With less than a month to go before the election, Bernadette Noe
and her board had yet to process 20,000 voter registration cards.(103)
Board officials arbitrarily decided that mail-in cards (mostly
from the Republican suburbs) would be processed first, while registrations
dropped off at the board's office (the fruit of intensive Democratic
registration drives in the city) would be processed last.(104)
When a grass-roots group called Project Vote delivered a batch
of nearly 10,000 cards just before the October 4th deadline, an
elections official casually remarked, ''We may not get to them.''(105)
The same official then instructed employees to date-stamp an entire
box containing thousands of forms, rather than marking each individual
card, as required by law.(106) When the box was opened, officials
had no way of confirming that the forms were filed prior to the
deadline -- an error, state inspectors concluded, that could have
disenfranchised ''several thousand'' voters from Democratic strongholds.(107)
The most troubling incident uncovered
by the investigation was Noe's decision to allow Republican partisans
behind the counter in the board of elections office to make photocopies
of postcards sent to confirm voter registrations(108) -- records
that could have been used in the GOP's caging efforts. On their
second day in the office, the operatives were caught by an elections
official tampering with the documents.(109) Investigators slammed
the elections board for ''a series of egregious blunders'' that
caused ''the destruction, mutilation and damage of public records.''(110)
On Election Day, Noe sent a team of Republican
volunteers to the county warehouse where blank ballots were kept
out in the open, ''with no security measures in place.''(111)
The state's assistant director of elections, who just happened
to be observing the ballot distribution, demanded they leave.
The GOP operatives refused and ultimately had to be turned away
by police.(112)
In April 2005, Noe and the entire Board
of Elections were forced to resign. But once again, the damage
was done. At a ''Victory 2004'' rally held in Toledo four days
before the election, President Bush himself singled out a pair
of ''grass-roots'' activists for special praise: ''I want to thank
my friends Bernadette Noe and Tom Noe for their leadership in
Lucas County.''(113)
V. ''The Wrong Pew''_In one of his most
effective maneuvers, Blackwell prevented thousands of voters from
receiving provisional ballots on Election Day. The fail-safe ballots
were mandated in 2002, when Congress passed a package of reforms
called the Help America Vote Act. This would prevent a repeat
of the most egregious injustice in the 2000 election, when officials
in Florida barred thousands of lawfully registered minority voters
from the polls because their names didn't appear on flawed precinct
rolls. Under the law, would-be voters whose registration is questioned
at the polls must be allowed to cast provisional ballots that
can be counted after the election if the voter's registration
proves valid.(114)
''Provisional ballots were supposed to
be this great movement forward,'' says Tova Andrea Wang, an elections
expert who served with ex-presidents Jimmy Carter and Gerald Ford
on the commission that laid the groundwork for the Help America
Vote Act. ''But then different states erected barriers, and this
new right became totally eviscerated.''
In Ohio, Blackwell worked from the beginning
to curtail the availability of provisional ballots. (The ballots
are most often used to protect voters in heavily Democratic urban
areas who move often, creating more opportunities for data-entry
errors by election boards.) Six weeks before the vote, Blackwell
illegally decreed that poll workers should make on-the-spot judgments
as to whether or not a voter lived in the precinct, and provide
provisional ballots only to those deemed eligible.(115) When the
ruling was challenged in federal court, Judge James Carr could
barely contain his anger. The very purpose of the Help America
Vote Act, he ruled, was to make provisional ballots available
to voters told by precinct workers that they were ineligible:
''By not even mentioning this group -- the primary beneficiaries
of HAVA's provisional-voting provisions -- Blackwell apparently
seeks to accomplish the same result in Ohio in 2004 that occurred
in Florida in 2000.''(116)
But instead of complying with the judge's
order to expand provisional balloting, Blackwell insisted that
Carr was usurping his power as secretary of state and made a speech
in which he compared himself to Mohandas Gandhi, Martin Luther
King Jr. and the apostle Paul -- saying that he'd rather go to
jail than follow federal law.(117) The Sixth Circuit Court of
Appeals upheld Carr's ruling on October 23rd -- but the confusion
over the issue still caused untold numbers of voters across the
state to be illegally turned away at the polls on Election Day
without being offered provisional ballots.(118) A federal judge
also invalidated a decree by Blackwell that denied provisional
ballots to absentee voters who were never sent their ballots in
the mail. But that ruling did not come down until after 3 p.m.
on the day of the election, and likely failed to filter down to
the precinct level at all -- denying the franchise to even more
eligible voters.(119)
We will never know for certain how many
voters in Ohio were denied ballots by Blackwell's two illegal
orders. But it is possible to put a fairly precise number on those
turned away by his most disastrous directive. Traditionally, anyone
in Ohio who reported to a polling station in their county could
obtain a provisional ballot. But Blackwell decided to toss out
the ballots of anyone who showed up at the wrong precinct -- a
move guaranteed to disenfranchise Democrats who live in urban
areas crowded with multiple polling places. On October 14th, Judge
Carr overruled the order, but Blackwell appealed.(120) In court,
he was supported by his friend and campaign contributor Tom Noe,
who joined the case as an intervenor on behalf of the secretary
of state.(121) He also enjoyed the backing of Attorney General
John Ashcroft, who filed an amicus brief in support of Blackwell's
position -- marking the first time in American history that the
Justice Department had gone to court to block the right of voters
to vote.(122) The Sixth Circuit, stacked with four judges appointed
by George W. Bush, sided with Blackwell.(123)
Blackwell insists that his decision kept
the election clean. ''If we had allowed this notion of ?voters
without borders' to exist,'' he says, ''it would have opened the
door to massive fraud.'' But even Republicans were shocked by
the move. DeForest Soaries, the GOP chairman of the Election Assistance
Commission -- the federal agency set up to implement the Help
America Vote Act -- upbraided Blackwell, saying that the commission
disagreed with his decision to deny ballots to voters who showed
up at the wrong precinct. ''The purpose of provisional ballots
is to not turn anyone away from the polls,'' Soaries explained.
''We want as many votes to count as possible.''(124)
The decision left hundreds of thousands
of voters in predominantly Democratic counties to navigate the
state's bewildering array of 11,366 precincts, whose boundaries
had been redrawn just prior to the election.(125) To further compound
their confusion, the new precinct lines were misidentified on
the secretary of state's own Web site, which was months out of
date on Election Day. Many voters, out of habit, reported to polling
locations that were no longer theirs. Some were mistakenly assured
by poll workers on the grounds that they were entitled to cast
a provisional ballot at that precinct. Instead, thanks to Blackwell's
ruling, at least 10,000 provisional votes were tossed out after
Election Day simply because citizens wound up in the wrong line.(126)
In Toledo, Brandi and Brittany Stenson
each got in a different line to vote in the gym at St. Elizabeth
Seton School. Both of the sisters were registered to vote at the
polling place on the city's north side, in the shadow of the giant
DaimlerChrysler plant. Both cast ballots. But when the tallies
were added up later, the family resemblance came to an abrupt
end. Brittany's vote was counted -- but Brandi's wasn't. It wasn't
enough that she had voted in the right building. If she wanted
her vote to count, according to Blackwell's ruling, she had to
choose the line that led to her assigned table. Her ballot --
along with those of her mother, her brother and thirty-seven other
voters in the same precinct -- were thrown out(127) simply because
they were, in the words of Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones (D-Ohio),
''in the right church but the wrong pew.''(128)
All told, the deliberate chaos that resulted
from Blackwell's registration barriers did the trick. Black voters
in the state -- who went overwhelmingly for Kerry -- were twenty
percent more likely than whites to be forced to cast a provisional
ballot.(129) In the end, nearly three percent of all voters in
Ohio were forced to vote provisionally(130) -- and more than 35,000
of their ballots were ultimately rejected.(131)
VI. Long Lines_When Election Day dawned
on November 2nd, tens of thousands of Ohio voters who had managed
to overcome all the obstacles to registration erected by Blackwell
discovered that it didn't matter whether they were properly listed
on the voting rolls -- because long lines at their precincts prevented
them from ever making it to the ballot box. Would-be voters in
Dayton and Cincinnati routinely faced waits as long as three hours.
Those in inner-city precincts in Columbus, Cleveland and Toledo
-- which were voting for Kerry by margins of ninety percent or
more -- often waited up to seven hours. At Kenyon College, students
were forced to stand in line for eleven hours before being allowed
to vote, with the last voters casting their ballots after three
in the morning.(132)
A five-month analysis of the Ohio vote
conducted by the Democratic National Committee concluded in June
2005 that three percent of all Ohio voters who showed up to vote
on Election Day were forced to leave without casting a ballot.(133)
That's more than 174,000 voters. ''The vast majority of this lost
vote,'' concluded the Conyers report, ''was concentrated in urban,
minority and Democratic-leaning areas.''(134) Statewide, African-Americans
waited an average of fifty-two minutes to vote, compared to only
eighteen minutes for whites.(135)
The long lines were not only foreseeable
-- they were actually created by GOP efforts. Republicans in the
state legislature, citing new electronic voting machines that
were supposed to speed voting, authorized local election boards
to reduce the number of precincts across Ohio. In most cases,
the new machines never materialized -- but that didn't stop officials
in twenty of the state's eighty-eight counties, all of them favorable
to Democrats, from slashing the number of precincts by at least
twenty percent.(136)
Republican officials also created long
lines by failing to distribute enough voting machines to inner-city
precincts. After the Florida disaster in 2000, such problems with
machines were supposed to be a thing of the past. Under the Help
America Vote Act, Ohio received more than $30 million in federal
funds to replace its faulty punch-card machines with more reliable
systems.(137) But on Election Day, that money was sitting in the
bank. Why? Because Ken Blackwell had applied for an extension
until 2006, insisting that there was no point in buying electronic
machines that would later have to be retrofitted under Ohio law
to generate paper ballots.(138)
''No one has ever accused our secretary
of state of lacking in ability,'' says Rep. Kucinich. ''He's a
rather bright fellow, and he's involved in the most minute details
of his office. There's no doubt that he knew the effect of not
having enough voting machines in some areas.''
At liberal Kenyon College, where students
had registered in record numbers, local election officials provided
only two voting machines to handle the anticipated surge of up
to 1,300 voters. Meanwhile, fundamentalist students at nearby
Mount Vernon Nazarene University had one machine for 100 voters
and faced no lines at all.(139) Citing the lines at Kenyon, the
Conyers report concluded that the ''misallocation of machines
went beyond urban/suburban discrepancies to specifically target
Democratic areas.''(140)
In Columbus, which had registered 125,000
new voters(141) -- more than half of them black(142) -- the board
of elections estimated that it would need 5,000 machines to handle
the huge surge.(143) ''On Election Day, the county experienced
an unprecedented turnout that could only be compared to a 500-year
flood,'' says Matt Damschroder,(144) chairman of the Franklin
County Board of Elections and the former head of the Republican
Party in Columbus.(145) But instead of buying more equipment,
the Conyers investigation found, Damschroder decided to ''make
do'' with 2,741 machines.(146) And to make matters worse, he favored
his own party in distributing the equipment. According to The
Columbus Dispatch, precincts that had gone seventy percent or
more for Al Gore in 2000 were allocated seventeen fewer machines
in 2004, while strong GOP precincts received eight additional
machines.(147) An analysis by voter advocates found that all but
three of the thirty wards with the best voter-to-machine ratios
were in Bush strongholds; all but one of the seven with the worst
ratios were in Kerry country.(148)
The result was utterly predictable. According
to an investigation by the Columbus Free Press, white Republican
suburbanites, blessed with a surplus of machines, averaged waits
of only twenty-two minutes; black urban Democrats averaged three
hours and fifteen minutes.(149) ''The allocation of voting machines
in Franklin County was clearly biased against voters in precincts
with high proportions of African-Americans,'' concluded Walter
Mebane Jr., a government professor at Cornell University who conducted
a statistical analysis of the vote in and around Columbus.(150)
By midmorning, when it became clear that
voters were dropping out of line rather than braving the wait,
precincts appealed for the right to distribute paper ballots to
speed the process. Blackwell denied the request, saying it was
an invitation to fraud.(151) A lawsuit ensued, and the handwritten
affidavits submitted by voters and election officials offer a
heart-rending snapshot of an electoral catastrophe in the offing:(152)
From Columbus Precinct 44D:_''There are
three voting machines at this precinct. I have been informed that
in prior elections there were normally four voting machines. At
1:45 p.m. there are approximately eighty-five voters in line.
At this time, the line to vote is approximately three hours long.
This precinct is largely African-American. I have personally witnessed
voters leaving the polling place without voting due to the length
of the line.''
From Precinct 40:_''I am serving as a
presiding judge, a position I have held for some 15+ years in
precinct 40. In all my years of service, the lines are by far
the longest I have seen, with some waiting as long as four to
five hours. I expect the situation to only worsen as the early
evening heavy turnout approaches. I have requested additional
machines since 6:40 a.m. and no assistance has been offered.''
Precinct 65H:_''I observed a broken voting
machine that was not in use for approximately two hours. The precinct
judge was very diligent but could not get through to the BOE.''
Precinct 18A:_''At 4 p.m. the average
wait time is about 4.5 hours and continuing to increase?. Voters
are continuing to leave without voting.''
As day stretched into evening, U.S. District
Judge Algernon Marbley issued a temporary restraining order requiring
that voters be offered paper ballots.(153) But it was too late:
According to bipartisan estimates published in The Washington
Post, as many as 15,000 voters in Columbus had already given up
and gone home.(154) When closing time came at the polls, according
to the Conyers report, some precinct workers illegally dismissed
citizens who had waited for hours in the rain -- in direct violation
of Ohio law, which stipulates that those in line at closing time
are allowed to remain and vote.(155)
The voters disenfranchised by long lines
were overwhelmingly Democrats. Because of the unequal distribution
of voting equipment, the median turnout in Franklin County precincts
won by Kerry was fifty-one percent, compared to sixty-one percent
in those won by Bush. Assuming sixty percent turnout under more
equitable conditions, Kerry would have gained an additional 17,000
votes in the county.(156)
In another move certain to add to the
traffic jam at the polls, the GOP deployed 3,600 operatives on
Election Day to challenge voters in thirty-one counties -- most
of them in predominantly black and urban areas.(157) Although
it was billed as a means to ''ensure that voters are not disenfranchised
by fraud,''(158) Republicans knew that the challengers would inevitably
create delays for eligible voters. Even Mark Weaver, the GOP's
attorney in Ohio, predicted in late October that the move would
''create chaos, longer lines and frustration.''(159)
The day before the election, Judge Dlott
attempted to halt the challengers, ruling that ''there exists
an enormous risk of chaos, delay, intimidation and pandemonium
inside the polls and in the lines out the doors.'' Dlott was also
troubled by the placement of Republican challengers: In Hamilton
County, fourteen percent of new voters in white areas would be
confronted at the polls, compared to ninety-seven percent of new
voters in black areas.(160) But when the case was appealed to
the Supreme Court on Election Day, Justice John Paul Stevens allowed
the challenges to go forward. ''I have faith,'' he ruled, ''that
the elected officials and numerous election volunteers on the
ground will carry out their responsibilities in a way that will
enable qualified voters to cast their ballots.''(161)
In fact, Blackwell gave Republican challengers
unprecedented access to polling stations, where they intimidated
voters, worsening delays in Democratic precincts. By the end of
the day, thanks to a whirlwind of legal wrangling, the GOP had
even gotten permission to use the discredited list of 35,000 names
from its illegal caging effort to challenge would-be voters.(162)
According to the survey by the DNC, nearly 5,000 voters across
the state were turned away at the polls because of registration
challenges -- even though federal law required that they be provided
with provisional ballots.(163)
VII. Faulty Machines_Voters who managed
to make it past the array of hurdles erected by Republican officials
found themselves confronted by voting machines that didn't work.
Only 800,000 out of the 5.6 million votes in Ohio were cast on
electronic voting machines, but they were plagued with errors.(164)
In heavily Democratic areas around Youngstown, where nearly 100
voters reported entering ''Kerry'' on the touch screen and watching
''Bush'' light up, at least twenty machines had to be recalibrated
in the middle of the voting process for chronically flipping Kerry
votes to Bush.(165) (Similar ''vote hopping'' from Kerry to Bush
was reported by voters and election officials in other states.)(166)
Elsewhere, voters complained in sworn affidavits that they touched
Kerry's name on the screen and it lit up, but that the light had
gone out by the time they finished their ballot; the Kerry vote
faded away.(167) In the state's most notorious incident, an electronic
machine at a fundamentalist church in the town of Gahanna recorded
a total of 4,258 votes for Bush and 260 votes for Kerry.(168)
In that precinct, however, there were only 800 registered voters,
of whom 638 showed up.(169) (The error, which was later blamed
on a glitchy memory card, was corrected before the certified vote
count.)
In addition to problems with electronic
machines, Ohio's vote was skewed by old-fashioned punch-card equipment
that posed what even Blackwell acknowledged was the risk of a
''Florida-like calamity.''(170) All but twenty of the state's
counties relied on antiquated machines that were virtually guaranteed
to destroy votes(171) -- many of which were counted by automatic
tabulators manufactured by Triad Governmental Systems,(172) the
same company that supplied Florida's notorious butterfly ballot
in 2000. In fact, some 95,000 ballots in Ohio recorded no vote
for president at all -- most of them on punch-card machines. Even
accounting for the tiny fraction of voters in each election who
decide not to cast votes for president -- generally in the range
of half a percent, according to Ohio State law professor and respected
elections scholar Dan Tokaji -- that would mean that at least
66,000 votes were invalidated by faulty voting equipment.(173)
If counted by hand instead of by automated tabulator, the vast
majority of these votes would have been discernable. But thanks
to a corrupt recount process, only one county hand-counted its
ballots.(174)
Most of the uncounted ballots occurred
in Ohio's big cities. In Cleveland, where nearly 13,000 votes
were ruined, a New York Times analysis found that black precincts
suffered more than twice the rate of spoiled ballots than white
districts.(175) In Dayton, Kerry-leaning precincts had nearly
twice the number of spoiled ballots as Bush-leaning precincts.(176)
Last April, a federal court ruled that Ohio's use of punch-card
balloting violated the equal-protection rights of the citizens
who voted on them.(177)
In addition to spoiling ballots, the punch-card
machines also created bizarre miscounts known as ''ballot crawl.''
In Cleveland Precinct 4F, a heavily African-American precinct,
Constitution Party candidate Michael Peroutka was credited with
an impressive forty-one percent of the vote. In Precinct 4N, where
Al Gore won ninety-eight percent of the vote in 2000, Libertarian
Party candidate Michael Badnarik was credited with thirty-three
percent of the vote. Badnarik and Peroutka also picked up a sizable
portion of the vote in precincts across Cleveland -- 11M, 3B,
8G, 8I, 3I.(178) ''It appears that hundreds, if not thousands,
of votes intended to be cast for Senator Kerry were recorded as
being for a third-party candidate,'' the Conyers report concludes.(179)
But it's not just third-party candidates:
Ballot crawl in Cleveland also shifted votes from Kerry to Bush.
In Precinct 13B, where Bush received only six votes in 2000, he
was credited with twenty percent of the total in 2004. Same story
in 9P, where Bush recorded eighty-seven votes in 2004, compared
to his grand total of one in 2000.(180)
VIII. Rural Counties_Despite the well-documented
effort that prevented hundreds of thousands of voters in urban
and minority precincts from casting ballots, the worst theft in
Ohio may have quietly taken place in rural counties. An examination
of election data suggests widespread fraud -- and even good old-fashioned
stuffing of ballot boxes -- in twelve sparsely populated counties
scattered across southern and western Ohio: Auglaize, Brown, Butler,
Clermont, Darke, Highland, Mercer, Miami, Putnam, Shelby, Van
Wert and Warren. (See The Twelve Suspect Counties) One key indicator
of fraud is to look at counties where the presidential vote departs
radically from other races on the ballot. By this measure, John
Kerry's numbers were suspiciously low in each of the twelve counties
-- and George Bush's were unusually high.
Take the case of Ellen Connally, a Democrat
who lost her race for chief justice of the state Supreme Court.
When the ballots were counted, Kerry should have drawn far more
votes than Connally -- a liberal black judge who supports gay
rights and campaigned on a shoestring budget. And that's exactly
what happened statewide: Kerry tallied 667,000 more votes for
president than Connally did for chief justice, outpolling her
by a margin of thirty-two percent. Yet in these twelve off-the-radar
counties, Connally somehow managed to outperform the best-funded
Democrat in history, thumping Kerry by a grand total of 19,621
votes -- a margin of ten percent.(181) The Conyers report -- recognizing
that thousands of rural Bush voters were unlikely to have backed
a gay-friendly black judge roundly rejected in Democratic precincts
-- suggests that ''thousands of votes for Senator Kerry were lost.''(182)
Kucinich, a veteran of elections in the
state, puts it even more bluntly. ''Down-ticket candidates shouldn't
outperform presidential candidates like that,'' he says. ''That
just doesn't happen. The question is: Where did the votes for
Kerry go?''
They certainly weren't invalidated by
faulty voting equipment: a trifling one percent of presidential
ballots in the twelve suspect counties were spoiled. The more
likely explanation is that they were fraudulently shifted to Bush.
Statewide, the president outpolled Thomas Moyer, the Republican
judge who defeated Connally, by twenty-one percent. Yet in the
twelve questionable counties, Bush's margin over Moyer was fifty
percent -- a strong indication that the president's certified
vote total was inflated. If Kerry had maintained his statewide
margin over Connally in the twelve suspect counties, as he almost
assuredly would have done in a clean election, he would have bested
her by 81,260 ballots. That's a swing of 162,520 votes from Kerry
to Bush -- more than enough to alter the outcome. (183)
''This is very strong evidence that the
count is off in those counties,'' says Freeman, the poll analyst.
''By itself, without anything else, what happened in these twelve
counties turns Ohio into a Kerry state. To me, this provides every
indication of fraud.''
How might this fraud have been carried
out? One way to steal votes is to tamper with individual ballots
-- and there is evidence that Republicans did just that. In Clermont
County, where optical scanners were used to tabulate votes, sworn
affidavits by election observers given to the House Judiciary
Committee describe ballots on which marks for Kerry were covered
up with white stickers, while marks for Bush were filled in to
replace them. Rep. Conyers, in a letter to the FBI, described
the testimony as ''strong evidence of vote tampering if not outright
fraud.'' (184) In Miami County, where Connally outpaced Kerry,
one precinct registered a turnout of 98.55 percent (185) -- meaning
that all but ten eligible voters went to the polls on Election
Day. An investigation by the Columbus Free Press, however, collected
affidavits from twenty-five people who swear they didn't vote.
(186)
In addition to altering individual ballots,
evidence suggests that Republicans tampered with the software
used to tabulate votes. In Auglaize County, where Kerry lost not
only to Connally but to two other defeated Democratic judicial
candidates, voters cast their ballots on touch-screen machines.
(187) Two weeks before the election, an employee of ES&S,
the company that manufactures the machines, was observed by a
local election official making an unauthorized log-in to the central
computer used to compile election results. (188) In Miami County,
after 100 percent of precincts had already reported their official
results, an additional 18,615 votes were inexplicably added to
the final tally. The last-minute alteration awarded 12,000 of
the votes to Bush, boosting his margin of victory in the county
by nearly 6,000. (189)
The most transparently crooked incident
took place in Warren County. In the leadup to the election, Blackwell
had illegally sought to keep reporters and election observers
at least 100 feet away from the polls. (190) The Sixth Circuit,
ruling that the decree represented an unconstitutional violation
of the First Amendment, noted ominously that ''democracies die
behind closed doors.'' But the decision didn't stop officials
in Warren County from devising a way to count the vote in secret.
Immediately after the polls closed on Election Day, GOP officials
-- citing the FBI -- declared that the county was facing a terrorist
threat that ranked ten on a scale of one to ten. The county administration
building was hastily locked down, allowing election officials
to tabulate the results without any reporters present.
In fact, there was no terrorist threat.
The FBI declared that it had issued no such warning, and an investigation
by The Cincinnati Enquirer unearthed e-mails showing that the
Republican plan to declare a terrorist alert had been in the works
for eight days prior to the election. Officials had even refined
the plot down to the language they used on signs notifying the
public of a lockdown. (When ROLLING STONE requested copies of
the same e-mails from the county, officials responded that the
documents have been destroyed.) (191)
The late-night secrecy in Warren County
recalls a classic trick: Results are held back until it's determined
how many votes the favored candidate needs to win, and the totals
are then adjusted accordingly. When Warren County finally announced
its official results -- one of the last counties in the state
to do so (192) -- the results departed wildly from statewide patterns.
John Kerry received 2,426 fewer votes for president than Ellen
Connally, the poorly funded black judge, did for chief justice.
(193) As the Conyers report concluded, ''It is impossible to rule
out the possibility that some sort of manipulation of the tallies
occurred on election night in the locked-down facility.'' (194)
Nor does the electoral tampering appear
to have been isolated to these dozen counties. Ohio, like several
other states, had an initiative on the ballot in 2004 to outlaw
gay marriage. Statewide, the measure proved far more popular than
Bush, besting the president by 470,000 votes. But in six of the
twelve suspect counties -- as well as in six other small counties
in central Ohio -- Bush outpolled the ban on same-sex unions by
16,132 votes. To trust the official tally, in other words, you
must believe that thousands of rural Ohioans voted for both President
Bush and gay marriage. (195)
IX. Rigging the Recount_After Kerry conceded
the election, his campaign helped the Libertarian and Green parties
pay for a recount of all eighty-eight counties in Ohio. Under
state law, county boards of election were required to randomly
select three percent of their precincts and recount the ballots
both by hand and by machine. If the two totals reconciled exactly,
a costly hand recount of the remaining votes could be avoided;
machines could be used to tally the rest.
But election officials in Ohio worked
outside the law to avoid hand recounts. According to charges brought
by a special prosecutor in April, election officials in Cleveland
fraudulently and secretly pre-counted precincts by hand to identify
ones that would match the machine count. They then used these
pre-screened precincts to select the ''random'' sample of three
percent used for the recount.
''If it didn't balance, they excluded
those precincts,'' said the prosecutor, Kevin Baxter, who has
filed felony indictments against three election workers in Cleveland.
''They screwed with the process and increased the probability,
if not the certainty, that there would not be a full, countywide
hand count.'' (196)
Voting machines were also tinkered with
prior to the recount. In Hocking County, deputy elections director
Sherole Eaton caught an employee of Triad -- which provided the
software used to count punch-card ballots in nearly half of Ohio's
counties (197) -- making unauthorized modifications to the tabulating
computer before the recount. Eaton told the Conyers committee
that the same employee also provided county officials with a ''cheat
sheet'' so that ''the count would come out perfect and we wouldn't
have to do a full hand-recount of the county.'' (198) After Eaton
blew the whistle on the illegal tampering, she was fired.
(199) The same Triad employee was dispatched
to do the same work in at least five other counties. (200) Company
president Tod Rapp -- who contributed to Bush's campaign (201)
-- has confirmed that Triad routinely makes such tabulator adjustments
to help election officials avoid hand recounts. In the end, every
county serviced by Triad failed to conduct full recounts by hand.
(202)
Even more troubling, in at least two counties,
Fulton and Henry, Triad was able to connect to tabulating computers
remotely via a dial-up connection, and reprogram them to recount
only the presidential ballots. (203) If that kind of remote tabulator
modification is possible for the purposes of the recount, it's
no great leap to wonder if such modifications might have helped
skew the original vote count. But the window for settling such
questions is closing rapidly: On November 2nd of this year, on
the second anniversary of the election, state officials will be
permitted under Ohio law to shred all ballots from the 2004 election.
(204)
X. What's At Stake_The mounting evidence
that Republicans employed broad, methodical and illegal tactics
in the 2004 election should raise serious alarms among news organizations.
But instead of investigating allegations of wrongdoing, the press
has simply accepted the result as valid. ''We're in a terrible
fix,'' Rep. Conyers told me. ''We've got a media that uses its
bullhorn in reverse -- to turn down the volume on this outrage
rather than turning it up. That's why our citizens are not up
in arms.''
The lone news anchor who seriously questioned
the integrity of the 2004 election was Keith Olbermann of MSNBC.
I asked him why he stood against the tide. ''I was a sports reporter,
so I was used to dealing with numbers,'' he said. ''And the numbers
made no sense. Kerry had an insurmountable lead in the exit polls
on Election Night -- and then everything flipped.'' Olbermann
believes that his journalistic colleagues fell down on the job.
''I was stunned by the lack of interest by investigative reporters,''
he said. ''The Republicans shut down Warren County, allegedly
for national security purposes -- and no one covered it. Shouldn't
someone have sent a camera and a few reporters out there?''
Olbermann attributes the lack of coverage
to self-censorship by journalists. ''You can rock the boat, but
you can never say that the entire ocean is in trouble,'' he said.
''You cannot say: By the way, there's something wrong with our
electoral system.''
Federal officials charged with safeguarding
the vote have also failed to contest the election. ''Congress
hasn't investigated this at all,'' says Kucinich. ''There has
been no oversight over our nation's most basic right: the right
to vote. How can we call ourselves a beacon of democracy abroad
when the right to vote hasn't been secured in free and fair elections
at home?''
Sen. John Kerry -- in a wide-ranging discussion
of ROLLING STONE's investigation -- expressed concern about Republican
tactics in 2004, but stopped short of saying the election was
stolen. ''Can I draw a conclusion that they played tough games
and clearly had an intent to reduce the level of our vote? Yes,
absolutely. Can I tell you to a certainty that it made the difference
in the election? I can't. There's no way for me to do that. If
I could have done that, then obviously I would have found some
legal recourse.''
Kerry conceded, however, that the widespread
irregularities make it impossible to know for certain that the
outcome reflected the will of the voters. ''I think there are
clearly states where it is questionable whether everybody's vote
is being counted, whether everybody is being given the opportunity
to register and to vote,'' he said. ''There are clearly barriers
in too many places to the ability of people to exercise their
full franchise. For that to be happening in the United States
of America today is disgraceful.''
Kerry's comments were echoed by Howard
Dean, the chairman of the Democratic National Committee. ''I'm
not confident that the election in Ohio was fairly decided,''
Dean says. ''We know that there was substantial voter suppression,
and the machines were not reliable. It should not be a surprise
that the Republicans are willing to do things that are unethical
to manipulate elections. That's what we suspect has happened,
and we'd like to safeguard our elections so that democracy can
still be counted on to work.''
To help prevent a repeat of 2004, Kerry
has co-sponsored a package of election reforms called the Count
Every Vote Act. The measure would increase turnout by allowing
voters to register at the polls on Election Day, provide provisional
ballots to voters who inadvertently show up at the wrong precinct,
require electronic voting machines to produce paper receipts verified
by voters, and force election officials like Blackwell to step
down if they want to join a campaign. (205) But Kerry says his
fellow Democrats have been reluctant to push the reforms, fearing
that Republicans would use their majority in Congress to create
even more obstacles to voting. ''The real reason there is no appetite
up here is that people are afraid the Republicans will amend HAVA
and shove something far worse down our throats,'' he told me.
On May 24th, Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.)
tried unsuccessfully to amend the immigration bill to bar anyone
who lacks a government-issued photo ID from voting (206) -- a
rule that would disenfranchise at least six percent of Americans,
the majority of them urban and poor, who lack such identification.
(207) The GOP-controlled state legislature in Indiana passed a
similar measure, and an ID rule in Georgia was recently struck
down as unconstitutional. (208)
''Why erect those kinds of hurdles unless
you're afraid of voters?'' asks Ralph Neas, director of People
for the American Way. ''The country will be better off if everyone
votes -- Democrats and Republicans. But that is not the Blackwell
philosophy, that is not the George W. Bush or Jeb Bush philosophy.
They want to limit the franchise and go to extraordinary lengths
to make it more difficult to vote.''
The issue of what happened in 2004 is
not an academic one. For the second election in a row, the president
of the United States was selected not by the uncontested will
of the people but under a cloud of dirty tricks. Given the scope
of the GOP machinations, we simply cannot be certain that the
right man now occupies the Oval Office -- which means, in effect,
that we have been deprived of our faith in democracy itself.
American history is littered with vote
fraud -- but rather than learning from our shameful past and cleaning
up the system, we have allowed the problem to grow even worse.
If the last two elections have taught us anything, it is this:
The single greatest threat to our democracy is the insecurity
of our voting system. If people lose faith that their votes are
accurately and faithfully recorded, they will abandon the ballot
box. Nothing less is at stake here than the entire idea of a government
by the people.
Voting, as Thomas Paine said, ''is the
right upon which all other rights depend.'' Unless we ensure that
right, everything else we hold dear is in jeopardy.
Thirdworldization
of America
Democracy in America
Home Page