The facts about the
Multilateral Agreement on Investment (MAI)
from the Friends Of the Earth internet website
Proponents of free trade and globalization have turned their
sights to the next target for liberalization and deregulation--foreign
investment. Recognizing that foreign investment has become the
main force behind economic integration, multinational corporations
and industrialized countries are advocating a Multilateral Agreement
on Investment (MAI). The MAI -- which is being negotiated at the
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) --would
'open' all sectors of countries' economies, strip nations and
localities of their right to differentiate between local and foreign
companies, and let corporations directly challenge our laws.
ELEMENTS of the Multilateral Agreement on Investment (MAI)
The OECD MAI will:
1. OPEN ALL SECTORS of nations' economies to foreign companies.
2. Require countries, including states and localities, to
TREAT FOREIGN INVESTORS THE SAME AS LOCAL COMPANIES
3. BAN PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS. Some states and localities
require companies who get public money to hire locally or pay
a living wage. These type of accountability measures may be struck
down by an MAI.
4. SET BINDING DISPUTE SETTLEMENT RULES. The MAI allows investors
to directly challenge laws and seek monetary damages.
CONCERNS- What's Wrong with the MAI?
1. CLOSED SECRETIVE NEGOTIATIONS. The MAI has been negotiated
with little public or congressional input. The wide range of concerns
raised by international capital mobility- sustainability, labor
right, financial stability-have largely been ignored.
2. OPENS DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. OECD members are the source
of 85% and destination of 65% of foreign investment, but increasing
amounts of money go to developing countries. OECD countries will
pressure developing nations to join the MAI, an agreement they
had no role in drafting.
3. PREEMPTION OF LOCAL, STATE & NATIONAL LAWS. The US
may have to change some laws to join the MAI. Then foreign companies
can use the MAI dispute system to challenge laws that affect their
investments.
4. ALL RIGHTS, NO RESPONSIBILITY. Corporate investors get
new rights, but there are no mechanisms to hold them accountable
to the social and environmental concerns of the countries they
came from, or the countries they invest in.
5. EFFECTS ON SUSTAINABILITY. The MAI will contain weak, non-binding
environmental provisions. Meanwhile, the agreement will let corporations
go everywhere and buy everything, allowing us to temporarily live
beyond our ecological limits and worsening an already inequitable
distribution of resources.
IT'S ALL ABOUT CAPITAL MOBILITY...
What does an agreement on foreign investment really do? It
guarantees un-restricted capital mobility- the right of big companies
and financial institutions to go where they want, leave on their
own terms, and therefore play one country against another for
the most favorable 'climate' for investment leading to a downwards
spiral of labor and environmental standards.
WHAT SHOULD BE DONE?
1. Slow negotiations down to allow Congress and citizens to
have some input.
2. Study potential impacts of the agreement, including undertaking
an environmental impact assessment.
3. Maintain nations' democratic right to protect the environment,
health, workers and small businesses.
4. Balance corporate rights with obligations. Require investors
to follow the stronger of home or host country environmental and
labor standards.
5. Any agreement without such safeguards should be defeated.
This investment agreement must protect the public interest, not
just the narrow needs of transnational capital.
Multilateral
Agreement on Investments